comparison · Instant swap (no account)
Alfacash vs Easybit
Both are listed in Instant swap (no account). The table below pulls directly from each service’s data sheet; see each entry for sourcing.
| Field | Alfacash | Easybit |
|---|---|---|
| KYC | optional KYC | optional KYC |
| Category | Instant swap (no account) | Instant swap (no account) |
| Jurisdiction | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (operator-disclosed) | unknown |
| Payment methods | crypto, card (via partners) | crypto |
| Fiat on-ramp | yes | no |
| Custodial | no | no |
| Open source | no | no |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Last verified | May 12, 2026 | May 12, 2026 |
Alfacash — summary
Alfacash is a smaller no-account instant exchanger included in major aggregator backends.
- + No-account standard swap flow.
- + Listed in Trocador aggregator backend roster.
- + Fixed-rate quotes available.
- − Smaller operator with less public track record than ChangeNOW / SimpleSwap.
- − Same category caveats apply — AML-driven holds are possible.
- − Facts need re-verification by operator (last seeded 2026-05).
Easybit — summary
Easybit is a smaller no-account instant exchanger included as a backup in some aggregator routes.
- + No-account standard swap flow.
- + Included in some aggregator backend rosters.
- − Smaller operator with limited public track record.
- − Same category caveats — AML-driven holds possible.
- − Operator transparency is below the larger backends; treat as a tertiary route.
When to choose which
Treat this section as heuristic. Privacy properties depend on how you use the service, not just which one you pick.
- Choose Alfacash if no-account standard swap flow..
- Choose Easybit if no-account standard swap flow..
- Either way, re-check the entry’s last verified date — the Instant swap (no account) category churns.
Compared as of .