comparison · Privacy email
cock.li vs Mailfence
Both are listed in Privacy email. The table below pulls directly from each service’s data sheet; see each entry for sourcing.
| Field | cock.li | Mailfence |
|---|---|---|
| KYC | no KYC | optional KYC |
| Category | Privacy email | Privacy email |
| Jurisdiction | Romania (operator-disclosed) | Belgium (operator-disclosed) |
| Payment methods | crypto | crypto, card, paypal, bank-transfer |
| Fiat on-ramp | no | no |
| Custodial | yes | yes |
| Open source | no | no |
| Founded | 2013 | 2013 |
| Last verified | Jan 1, 2026 | Jan 1, 2026 |
cock.li — summary
cock.
- + One of the longest-running zero-data email signup services.
- + No recovery address — strictly self-key.
- + Tor-friendly; clearnet and onion both supported.
- − Many third parties blocklist the entire @cock.li domain because of historical abuse.
- − No paid tier; the project is operator-funded and donation-supported.
- − PGP-only encryption.
Mailfence — summary
Mailfence is the PGP-native alternative to Proton Mail for users who want IMAP/SMTP and openness over default encryption.
- + PGP-native; integrates with OpenPGP keys directly.
- + IMAP/SMTP supported.
- + Belgian privacy law has historically protected smaller mail providers.
- − Belgian jurisdiction is subject to EU cooperation.
- − PGP-only encryption — outside-mail metadata is visible.
- − Facts need re-verification by operator (last seeded 2026-01).
When to choose which
Treat this section as heuristic. Privacy properties depend on how you use the service, not just which one you pick.
- Choose cock.li if one of the longest-running zero-data email signup services..
- Choose Mailfence if pgp-native; integrates with openpgp keys directly..
- Either way, re-check the entry’s last verified date — the Privacy email category churns.
Mentioned in (combined)
Pages on the site that reference cock.li, Mailfence, or both.
Ranked picks
Quick answers
Country pages
Compared as of .