comparison · DNS resolvers
ControlD vs Mullvad DNS
Both are listed in DNS resolvers. The table below pulls directly from each service’s data sheet; see each entry for sourcing.
| Field | ControlD | Mullvad DNS |
|---|---|---|
| KYC | optional KYC | no KYC |
| Category | DNS resolvers | DNS resolvers |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (operator-disclosed) | Sweden (operator-disclosed) |
| Payment methods | card, crypto | — |
| Fiat on-ramp | no | no |
| Custodial | no | no |
| Open source | no | no |
| Founded | 2020 | 2022 |
| Last verified | Jan 1, 2026 | Jan 1, 2026 |
ControlD — summary
ControlD is the most-featured public resolver after NextDNS.
- + Per-endpoint filtering and "redirect" rules.
- + Crypto payment accepted on paid tiers.
- − Account-bound for custom flows.
- − Operator is the same group as Windscribe — review the broader ad-incentive context.
- − Facts need re-verification by operator (last seeded 2026-01).
Mullvad DNS — summary
Mullvad DNS is the no-account complement to Mullvad VPN.
- + No account required; available to non-VPN-customers.
- + Multiple endpoints with different filtering (ads, trackers, adult, malware, social, families).
- + Operated by Mullvad, which has the strongest no-account VPN posture in the category.
- − Capacity is operator-budgeted; no SLA.
- − Single jurisdiction.
- − Facts need re-verification by operator (last seeded 2026-01).
When to choose which
Treat this section as heuristic. Privacy properties depend on how you use the service, not just which one you pick.
- Choose ControlD if per-endpoint filtering and "redirect" rules..
- Choose Mullvad DNS if no account required; available to non-vpn-customers..
- Either way, re-check the entry’s last verified date — the DNS resolvers category churns.
Mentioned in (combined)
Pages on the site that reference ControlD, Mullvad DNS, or both.
Quick answers
Country pages
Compared as of .