comparison · Instant swap (no account)

Easybit vs FixedFloat

Both are listed in Instant swap (no account). The table below pulls directly from each service’s data sheet; see each entry for sourcing.

Easybit — summary

Easybit is a smaller no-account instant exchanger included as a backup in some aggregator routes.

• + No-account standard swap flow.
• + Included in some aggregator backend rosters.
• − Smaller operator with limited public track record.
• − Same category caveats — AML-driven holds possible.
• − Operator transparency is below the larger backends; treat as a tertiary route.

Full entry → Easybit

FixedFloat — summary

FixedFloat is one of the larger no-account instant exchangers and one of the most-cited routes for BTC ↔ XMR swaps in the Monero community.

• + Wide asset coverage including Lightning, with both fixed-rate and floating-rate modes.
• + Order-status page is detailed enough to debug stuck swaps without contacting support.
• + No mandatory signup for the standard quote-and-swap flow.
• − In February 2024 FixedFloat disclosed an exploit that drained roughly $26M in BTC and ETH from its hot wallets; downstream effects on screening and review windows have persisted.
• − Holds with KYC-to-release have been widely reported across instant-exchanger reviewers; the screening provider and triggers are not public.
• − Facts need re-verification by operator (last seeded 2026-01).

Full entry → FixedFloat

When to choose which

Treat this section as heuristic. Privacy properties depend on how you use the service, not just which one you pick.

• Choose Easybit if no-account standard swap flow..
• Choose FixedFloat if wide asset coverage including lightning, with both fixed-rate and floating-rate modes..
• Either way, re-check the entry’s last verified date — the Instant swap (no account) category churns.

Mentioned in (combined)

Pages on the site that reference Easybit, FixedFloat, or both.

Compared as of May 12, 2026.