comparison · Privacy email
cock.li vs Disroot
Both are listed in Privacy email. The table below pulls directly from each service’s data sheet; see each entry for sourcing.
| Field | cock.li | Disroot |
|---|---|---|
| KYC | no KYC | no KYC |
| Category | Privacy email | Privacy email |
| Jurisdiction | Romania (operator-disclosed) | Netherlands (operator-disclosed) |
| Payment methods | crypto | donation |
| Fiat on-ramp | no | no |
| Custodial | yes | yes |
| Open source | no | yes |
| Founded | 2013 | 2015 |
| Last verified | Jan 1, 2026 | Jan 1, 2026 |
cock.li — summary
cock.
- + One of the longest-running zero-data email signup services.
- + No recovery address — strictly self-key.
- + Tor-friendly; clearnet and onion both supported.
- − Many third parties blocklist the entire @cock.li domain because of historical abuse.
- − No paid tier; the project is operator-funded and donation-supported.
- − PGP-only encryption.
Disroot — summary
Disroot is a small FOSS-collective offering email, storage, pads, and XMPP under a single username.
- + Username-only signup; no recovery email.
- + Bundled services — email, Nextcloud, pads, XMPP — all on the same account.
- + All-FOSS infrastructure.
- − Volunteer-run; outages and slow response can be a thing.
- − Netherlands jurisdiction.
- − Facts need re-verification by operator (last seeded 2026-01).
When to choose which
Treat this section as heuristic. Privacy properties depend on how you use the service, not just which one you pick.
- Choose cock.li if one of the longest-running zero-data email signup services..
- Choose Disroot if username-only signup; no recovery email..
- Either way, re-check the entry’s last verified date — the Privacy email category churns.
Mentioned in (combined)
Pages on the site that reference cock.li, Disroot, or both.
Ranked picks
Quick answers
Country pages
Compared as of .