comparison · Encrypted storage
Disroot vs Internxt
Both are listed in Encrypted storage. The table below pulls directly from each service’s data sheet; see each entry for sourcing.
| Field | Disroot | Internxt |
|---|---|---|
| KYC | no KYC | optional KYC |
| Category | Encrypted storage | Encrypted storage |
| Jurisdiction | Netherlands (operator-disclosed) | Spain (operator-disclosed) |
| Payment methods | donation | card, crypto |
| Fiat on-ramp | no | no |
| Custodial | yes | yes |
| Open source | yes | yes |
| Founded | 2015 | 2020 |
| Last verified | Jan 1, 2026 | Jan 1, 2026 |
Disroot — summary
Disroot is a small FOSS-collective offering email, storage, pads, and XMPP under a single username.
- + Username-only signup; no recovery email.
- + Bundled services — email, Nextcloud, pads, XMPP — all on the same account.
- + All-FOSS infrastructure.
- − Volunteer-run; outages and slow response can be a thing.
- − Netherlands jurisdiction.
- − Facts need re-verification by operator (last seeded 2026-01).
Internxt — summary
Internxt is an open-source-client Spanish alternative to Filen with broadly similar privacy claims.
- + Open-source clients.
- + End-to-end encryption with sharded storage on the backend.
- + Crypto payment on paid plans.
- − Email signup.
- − Marketing-forward operator; treat the privacy claims as a starting point, not as audit conclusions.
- − Facts need re-verification by operator (last seeded 2026-01).
When to choose which
Treat this section as heuristic. Privacy properties depend on how you use the service, not just which one you pick.
- Choose Disroot if username-only signup; no recovery email..
- Choose Internxt if open-source clients..
- Either way, re-check the entry’s last verified date — the Encrypted storage category churns.
Mentioned in (combined)
Pages on the site that reference Disroot, Internxt, or both.
Ranked picks
Quick answers
Country pages
Compared as of .